REVIEW
The role of guidelines on pest monitoring and warning systems in integrated pest management
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Pest Monitoring and Signalization, Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute, Poznań, Poland
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2018-03-07
Acceptance date: 2018-07-16
Online publication date: 2018-09-26
Corresponding author
Anna Tratwal
Department of Pest Monitoring and Signalization, Institute of Plant Protection - National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 61-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2018;58(3):211-214
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The rules and guidelines for integrated pest management specified in Annex III, sections 2 and 3, state “General principles of integrated pest management”: Harmful organisms must be monitored by adequate methods and tools, where available. Such adequate tools should include observations in the field as well as scientifically sound warnings, forecasting and early diagnostic systems, where feasible, as well as advice from professionally qualified advisors.
As part of Multiannual Programs, the Institute of Plant Protection – NRI in Poznań has been carrying out work and research for many years to develop or modify guidelines for monitoring short- and long-term forecasting of pest occurrence on crops. These guidelines are extremely helpful for farmers and advisers in determining the optimum date of chemical control of pests on plants. Regularly revised and improved the guidelines deal with pests which currently pose a threat to crops. They are developed according to the latest scientific findings and are successfully promoted among professional users and agricultural advisors.
These guidelines are standardized to include descriptions of species, life cycles, symptoms of damage/infestation of crops, methods of observation targeted at warning of the need for plant protection treatments, and threshold values of harmfulness. All guidelines include extensive photographic material. Guidelines for the monitoring of pests on orchard plants, vegetables and others are prepared at the Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation
− NRI in Puławy and the Institute of Pomology in Skierniewice. Guidelines for about 80 pests of crops are available for public use in the on-line Pest Warning System (Platforma Sygnalizacji Agrofagów, www.agrofagi.com.pl).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Bubniewicz P., Walczak F., Mrówczyński M., Widerski K., Kaniuczak Z. 1993. Ochrona roślin w integrowanych systemach produkcji rolniczej. Skrzypionki występujące na zbożach i ich zwalczanie. [Plant control in integrated agriculture production. Cereal leaf beetles in cereals – occurrence and control]. Instytut Ochrony Roślin, Poznań: 1–9.
2.
Jorgensen L.N., Nielsen G.C. 1998. Reduced dosages of srobilurins for diseases management in winter wheat. Proceedings of the BCP Conference Pest and Diseases 3: 993–998.
3.
Matyjaszczyk E. 2013. Plant protection in Poland on the eye of obligatory integrated pest management implementation. Pest Management Science 69 (9): 991–995. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.357....
4.
Pruszyński S. 2011. Integrowana ochrona roślin – wyzwanie dla rolników, służb doradczych i nauki. [Integrated plant control – challenge for farmers, advisory service and science]. Zagadnienia Doradztwa Rolniczego 2: 49–65.
5.
Pruszyński S., Walczak F. 2006. Rola regionalnej sygnalizacji w wyznaczaniu optymalnego terminu zwalczania agrofagów. [The role of regional pests and diseases monitoring in determining of the optimal date of chemical control treatment]. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 46 (1): 169–175.
6.
Sahajdak A., Bereś P., Uznańska B., Konefał T. 2006. Zachodnia kukurydziana stonka korzeniowa – nowe zagrożenie dla upraw kukurydzy w Polsce. [Western corn rootworm – a new threat to maize crops in Poland]. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 46 (1): 256–261.
7.
Stern V.M., Ray F. Smith R. F., van den Bosch R., Hagen K.S. 1959. The integration of chemical and biological control of the spotted alfalfa aphid: The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29 (2): 81–101. DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v....
8.
Tratwal A., Jakubowska M., Roik K., Baran M., Wielkopolan B., StrażyńskI P. 2017. Stan fitosanitarny roślin uprawnych w Polsce w roku 2016 i spodziewane wystąpienie agrofagów w 2017. [Phytosanitary state of agricultural plants in Poland in 2016 and prognosis for 2017]. (A. Tratwal, ed.). Instytut Ochrony Roślin, Poznań, 122 pp.
9.
Walczak F. 2010. Monitoring agrofagów dla potrzeb integrowanej ochrony roślin uprawnych. [Agrophages monitoring for plant integrated control needs]. Fragmenta Agronomica 27 (4): 147–154.
http://polona.pl/item/42059384.
10.
Walczak F., Tratwal A. 2008. Zmiany klimatyczne jako czynnik wpływający na znaczenie gospodarcze agrofagów roślin rolniczych [Climate change as a factor influencing on agricultural plants agrophages economical meaning]. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 48 (3): 808–813.
11.
Walczak F., Tratwal A., Bocianowski J. 2015. Effect of changes in precipitation and temperature on selected agrophage risk in Poland in 1965–2009. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 24 (1): 325–332.
http://www.agrofagi.com.pl/28,... [The role of guidelines in pest.monitoring and warning systems in integrated pest management].