ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The problems of weed management by herbicide systems applied in maize
1
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute
Department of Ecology and Weed Control
Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
Corresponding author
Hanna Gołębiowska
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute Department of Ecology and Weed Control Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, State Research Institute Department of Ecology and Weed Control Orzechowa 61, 50-540 Wrocław, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2008;48(1):119-128
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Detailed recognition of weed infestation state and degree in south-western region of Poland provided the basis for starting field experiment on three types of soils aiming at the assessment of weed control effectiveness by means of suitably selected herbicide systems. High efficiency of weed elimination on alluvial soils was obtained due to herbicide mixture mesotrione + nicosulfuron in split doses. In the experiment established on brown soils the mentioned weed species were most satisfactorily controlled by herbicide mixture applied according to infestation degree: mesotrione + nicosulfuron i rimsulfuron + adjuvant + dicamba applied once in full doses. The mixture rimsulfuron + adjuvant + dicamba showed to be the most efficient regarding the weeds typical for alluvial soils, except for Elymus repens, numerously occurring in the experiment, which exhibited medium sesitivity, as well as winter forms of Anthemis arvensis. Mixture of rimsulfuron + adjuvant + florasulam + 2,4- D allowed to eliminate undesired plants on that soil stand in the most efficient way and to achieve the highest grain yield.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Dobrzański A., Adamczewski K. 2001. Przyszłościowe spojrzenie na metody ochrony roślin przed chwastami na progu XXI wieku. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 41: 58–68.
2.
Domaradzki K. 2006. Minimalne skuteczne dawki herbicydów w zwalczaniu Galium aparine w zbożach jarych. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 46: 269–272.
3.
De Prado R. 1995. Herbicide resistance in Europe: agricultural, biochemical and physiological aspects. Proceedings 9th International Symposium On Weed and Crop Resistance to Herbicides. Cordoba, Spain EWRS 1995: 35–42.
4.
Drexler G., Stuke F., Wagemans B. 1998. Control of difficult weeds in maize with Mikado and Mikado tank mixtures. Proceedings 16rd German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control. Stuttgart- Hohenheim, 10–12 March 1998. J. Plant Dis. Protect. XVI: 565–572.
5.
Kucharski M., Rola H., Marczewska K. 2004. Identification of weed biotypes showing resistance and cross–resistance to photosystem II inhibiting herbicides on fields of south–west Poland. Proceeding 2004 XIIeme Colloque Intrnational sur la Biologie des Mauvaises Herbes. Dijon 31–02 Septembre 2004, France: 547–553.
6.
Gołębiowska H., Rola H. 2004. Efekty niszczenia Elymus repens herbicydami Maister 310 WG, Titus 25 WG i Milagro 040 SC w uprawie kukurydzy w warunkach Dolnego Śląska. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 44: 695–698.
7.
Menck B., Klaassen H., Frenking H. 1998. Erffahrungen mit Motivell® zur Unkrautbekämpfung in Mais. Proceedings 16rd German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control. Stuttgart- Hohenheim, 10–12 March 1998. J. Plant Dis. Protect. XVI: 547–554.
8.
Proven M.J., Courtney A., Picton J., Davies D.H.K, Whiting A.J. 1991. Cost-effectiveness of weed control in cereals – system based on thresholds and reduced rates. The Brighton Crop Protection Conference, Weeds 1991: 1201–1208.
9.
Rola H., Marczewska K. 2002. Biotypy chwastów odporne na chlorosulfuron w rejonie Wrocławia. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 42: 575–577.
10.
Rola H. 2002. Ekologiczne i produkcyjne aspekty ochrony roślin przed chwastami. Pam. Puł. 130/II: 635–645.
11.
Rola H., Rola J. 2002. Występowanie Amaranthus retroflexus, Chenopodium album, Echinochloa crus-galli – biotypów odpornych na triazyny w kukurydzy na terenie południowo-zachodniej Polski. Pam. Puł. 129: 11–23.
12.
Sulewska H., Koziara W. 2006. Skuteczność wybranych herbicydów stosowanych powschodowo w kukurydzy. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 46: 243–245.
13.
Skrzypczak G. 1996. Problem zwalczania chwastów w uprawie kukurydzy wciąż aktualny. Kukurydza 1 (6): 18–19.
14.
Varga P., Beres I., Resinger P., Bosak P. 2000. The influence of sil herbicides on weeds in maize. Proceedings 17rd German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control. Stuttgart- Hohenheim, 14–16 March 2000. J. Plant Dis. Protect. XVII 641–647.
15.
Tyser L., Holec J. 2004. Evaluation of the weed composition of agrophytocenoses in selected agricultural regions of the Czech Republic. Proceedings 22nd German Conference on Weed Biology and Weed Control. Stuttgart–Hohenheim, 02–04 March 2004. J. Plant Dis. Protect. XIX: 209–214.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
