ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Susceptibility level of the Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) to chlorpyrifos and acetamiprid in Poland and resistance mechanisms of the pest to chlorpyrifos
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute
Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Corresponding author
Paweł Węgorek
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute
Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2011;51(3):279-284
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, neonicotinoids play an essential role in the control of the Colorado potato beetle (CPB) in Poland. Taking into
consideration that CPB shows some resistance to pyrethroids and the main role of oxidative metabolism in this resistance, research
was conducted to estimate CPB susceptibility level to chlorpyrifos and acetamiprid. The results pointed to a lack of CPB resistance to
acetamiprid and a weak susceptibility level to chlorpyrifos by the CPB. For this reason, the second part of the experiment was aimed
at detecting the resistance mechanisms of the CPB to chlorpyrifos. Results showed that none of the tested enzyme groups (oxidases,
esterases and glutathione transferases) are the reason for CPB resistance to chlorpyrifos. The experiments revealed an increase in the
beetles survival after adding oxidative enzyme blocker to chlorpyrifos.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Alyokhin A., Dively G., Patterson M., Castaldo C., Rogers D., Mahoney M. Wollam J. 2007.Resistance and cross-resistance to imidacloprid and thiamethoxam in the Colorado potato beetle.Pest Manage. Sci. 63: 32–41.
2.
Alyokhin A., Baker M., Mota-Sanchez, Dively G., Grafius E. 2008. Colorado potato beetle resistance to insecticides. Am. J. Potato Res. 85 (6): 395–413.
3.
Argentine J.A., Lee S.H., Sos M.A., barry S.R., Clark J.M. 1995. Permethrin resistance in a near isogenic strain of Colorado potato beetle. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 53: 97–115.
4.
Baker M., Alyokhin A., Porter A., Ferro D., Dastur S., Galal N. 2007. Persistence and inheritance of costs of resistance to imidacloprid in Colorado potato beetle. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1871–1879.
5.
Finney D.J. 1952. Probit Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press.
6.
Hoy C.W., Head G. 1995. Correlation between behavioral and physiological responses to transgenic potatoes containing Baccillus thuringiensis delta-endotoxin in Leptinotarsa decem-lineata(Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 480–486.
7.
Ioannidis P., Grafius E., Wierenga J., Whalon M., Hollingworth. 1992. Selection, inheritance and characterization of carbofuran resistance in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). Pest Sci. 35: 215–222.
8.
Kroczyński J., Bakuniak E., Malinowski H., Szczęsna E., Wnuk S. 1989. Badania laboratoryjne nad wrażliwością stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineataSay) na stosowane w latach 1986–1988 insektycydy. Materiały 29. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin cz. 2: 63–68.
9.
Malinowski H. 2003. Odporność Owadów na Insektycydy. Mechanizmy Powstawania i Możliwości Przeciwdziałania. Wyd. Wieś Jutra, 211 pp.
10.
Mota-Sanchez D., Hollingworth R.M., Grafius E.J., Moyer D.D. 2006. Resistance and cross-resistance to neonicotinoid insecticides and spinosad in the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pest Manage. Sci. 62: 30–37.
11.
Nauen R., Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U., Salgado V., Kaussmann M. 2003. Thiamethoxam is a neonicotinoid precursor converted to clothianidin in insects and plants. Pestic. Biochem. Phys. 76: 55–69.
12.
Olson E.R., Dively G.P., Nelson J.O.2000.Baseline susceptibility to imidacloprid and cross resistance patterns in Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) populations.J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 447–458.
13.
Richter R., Otto D., Mengs H.J. 1989. Insecticide compounds, acting on the acetylocholine receptor of the insect nervous system. p. 157–197. In: “Chemistry of Plant Protection” 2 – “Degradation of Pesticides, Dessication and Defoliation” (G. Hang, H. Hoffmann eds.). Ach – Receptors as Targets. Springer-Verlag, 256 pp.
14.
Różański L. 1992. Przemiany Pestycydów w Organizmach Żywych i w Środowisku. PWRiL, Warszawa, 275 pp.
15.
Sharif M., Hejazi M.J., Mohammadi A., Rashidi M.R. 2007.Resistance status of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, to endosulfan in East Azarbaijan and Ardabil provinces of Iran. 7 pp. J. Insect Sci. 7: 31, available online: www.insectscience.org/7.31.
16.
Silcox C.A., Ghidiu G.M., Forgash A.J. 1985. Laboratory and field evaluation of piperonyl butoxide as a pyrethroid synergist against the Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 78: 1399–1405.
17.
Stankovic S., Zabel A., Kostic M., Manojlovic B., Rajkovic S. 2004. Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) resistance to organophosphates and carbamates in Serbia.J. Pest Sci. 77 (1): 11–15.
18.
Węgorek P. 1994. Poziom wrażliwości wybranych populacji stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) z Wielkopolski na deltametrynę i chlorfenwinfos w latach 1992 i 1993. Materiały 34. Sesji Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin, cz. 2: 233–236.
19.
Węgorek P. 2004. Enzymy oksydacyjne jako główny czynnik odporności stonki ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) na pyretroidy w zachodniej Polsce. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 44 (2): 1208–1211.
20.
Węgorek P. 2005. Current status of resistance in Colorado potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) to selected active substances of insecticides in Poland. J. Plant Protection Res. 45 (4): 309–319.
21.
Węgorek P. 2007. Historia Odporności Owadów na Insektycydy na Przykładzie Stonki Ziemniaczanej (Leptinotarsa decem-lineata Say).Inst. Ochr. Roślin, Poznań, 68 pp.
22.
Węgorek P. 2009. Badania nad Odpornością Chrząszczy Słodyszka Rzepakowego (Meligethes aeneus F.) na Insektycydy. Rozpr. Nauk. Inst. Ochr. Roślin – PIB 20, 122 pp.
23.
Zhao J.Z., Bishop B.A., Grafius E.J. 2000. Inheritance and synergism of resistance to imidacloprid in the potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 93: 1508–1514.