ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Naphthalic anhydride increases tolerance of common bean to herbicides
1
Production and Plant Improvement Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agriculture, Botucatu, Brazil
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2019-02-21
Acceptance date: 2019-08-19
Online publication date: 2019-10-14
Corresponding author
Fábio Henrique Krenchinski
Production and Plant Improvement Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agriculture, Botucatu, Brazil
Production and Plant Improvement Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agriculture, Botucatu, Brazil
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2019;59(3):383-391
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this work was to evaluate the use of the naphthalic anhydride safener on the protection
of common bean cultivars BRS-Estilo (carioca) and BRS-Esplendor (black) from
negative effects of herbicides. Two experiments were conducted, one for each cultivar in
a complete randomized design with five replications, in a 6 × 3 factorial scheme, with six
herbicide treatments: bentazon, fluazifop-P + fomesafen, bentazon + imazamox, fomesafen,
cloransulam, and control without application, and three naphthalic anhydride treatments:
without application, foliar application, and application via seed treatment. Visible injuries
at 7, 14 and 21 days after application, photosystem II electron transport rate, and plant dry
weight were evaluated. The naphthalic anhydride applied via foliar, and seed treatment reduced
significantly the visible injuries in relation to the control when using the herbicides
bentazon, fluazifop-P + fomesafen, bentazon + imazamox, and cloransulam. The photosystem
II electron transport rate was protected by anhydride applied via foliar and seed
treatment when using the herbicides bentazon, fluazifop-P + fomesafen and bentazon +
+ imazamox. The application of naphthalic anhydride via seed treatment protected the
BRS-Estilo and BRS-Esplendor common bean cultivars, with no reductions in the plant dry
weight when using the herbicides fluazifop-P + fomesafen, and fomesafen. The use of naphthalic
anhydride via seed treatment and foliar application protected BRS-Estilo and BRSEsplendor
common bean cultivars, from the negative effects of fluazifop-P + fomesafen and
fomesafen herbicides. Thus, this practice has potential to be used in common beans.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Abu-Qare A.W., Duncan H.J. 2002. Herbicide safener: uses, limitations, metabolism, and mechanisms of action. Chemosphere 48 (4): 965–974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-....
2.
Aly M.A.S., Schroder P. 2008. Effect of herbicides on glutathione S-transferases in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 15 (2): 143–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr20....
3.
Araldi R., Velini E.D., Girotto M., Carbonari C.A., Jasper S.P., Trindade M.L.B. 2011. Efeitos na taxa de transporte de elétrons de plantas daninhas após aplicação de amicarbazone. [Effects on the electron transport rate of weeds after amicarbazone application]. Planta Daninha 29 (3): 647–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-... (in Portuguese with English abstract).
4.
Araldi R., Corniani N., Tropaldi L., Girotto M., Belapart D., Simões P.S., Velini E.D. 2015. Chlorophyll fluorescence in guanandi tree (Calophyllum brasiliense) after herbicide application. Planta Daninha 33 (1): 77–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
5.
Araújo G.A.A., Silva A.A., Thomas A., Rocha P.R.P. 2008. Misturas de herbicidas com adubo molíbdico na cultura do Feijão. [Mixtures of herbicides and molybdic fertilizer in beans]. Planta Daninha 26 (1): 237–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-... (in Portuguese with English abstract).
6.
Cataneo A.C., Ferreira L.C., Mishcan M.M., Velini E.D., Corniani N., Cerdeira A.L. 2013. Mefenpyr-diethyl action on fenoxaprop-p-ethyl detoxification in wheat varieties. Planta Daninha 31 (2): 387–393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
7.
Cataneo A.C., Chamma K.L., Ferreira L.C., Déstro G.F.G., Carvalho, J.C., Novelli E.L.B. 2002. Glutathione S-transferase activity in acetochlor, atrazine and oxyfluorfen metabolization in maize (Zea mays L.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) (Poaceae). Acta Scientiarum: Biological and Health Sciences 24: (2): 619–623. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasc....
8.
Cho H.Y., Kong K.H. 2007. Study on the biochemical characterization of herbicide detoxification enzyme, glutathione S‐transferase. Biofactors 30 (4): 281–287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5....
9.
Conab 2018. Follow-up of the Brazilian crop: Crop 2018/19. 127 p. Available on: https://www.conab.gov.br/.
10.
Cummins I., Bryant D.N., Edwards R. 2009. Safener responsiveness and multiple herbicide resistance in the weed black‐grass (Alopecurus myosuroides). Plant Biotechnology Journal 7 (8): 807–820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467....
11.
Darwish M., Lopez-Lauri F., Sallanon H. 2013. Study of photosynthesis process in the presence of low concentrations of clomazone herbicide in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum). Journal of Stress Physiology & Biochemistry 9 (1): 229–245.
12.
Davies J., Caseley J.C. 1999. Herbicide safeners: a review. Pest Management Science 55 (11): 1043–1058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)...<1043::AIDPS60>3.0.CO;2-L.
13.
Del Peloso M.J., Melo, L.C. 2005. Potencial de rendimento da cultura do feijoeiro comum. Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 131 p.
14.
Ferreira D.F. 2014. Sisvar: a guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 38 (2) 109–112. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S141....
15.
Ferreira L.C., Cataneo A.C. 2001. Aspectos bioquímicos da ação “de safeners”. Ciência das Plantas Daninhas – Boletim informative 8 (1): 5–6. Available on: https://www.researchgate.net/p....
16.
Fontes J.R.A., Oliveira Júnior I., Gonçalves J.R.P. 2013. Seletividade e eficácia de herbicidas para cultura do feijão-caupi. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 12 (1): 47–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v1... (in Portuguese).
17.
Galon L., Maciel C.D.G., Agostinetto D., Concenço G., Moraes P.V.D. 2011. Seletividade de herbicidas nas culturas pelo uso de protetores químicos. Revista Brasileira de Herbicidas 10 (3): 291–304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7824/rbh.v1... (in Portuguese).
18.
Hirase K., Molin W.T. 2001. Effect of flurazole and other safeners for chloroacetanilide herbicides on cysteine synthase in sorghum shoots. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 71 (2): 116–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/pest.2....
19.
Macedo R.S., Lombardi A.T., Omachi C.Y., Rorig L.R. 2008. Effects of the herbicide bentazon on growth and photosystem II maximum quantum yield of the marine diatom Skeletonema costatum. Toxicology in Vitro 22: (3): 716–722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.....
20.
Machado A.F.L., Camargo A.P.M., Ferreira L.R., Sediyama T., Ferreira F.A., Viana R.G. 2006. Misturas de herbicidas no manejo de plantas daninhas na cultura do feijão. [Herbicide mixtures in weed management in bean culture]. Planta Daninha 24 (1): 107–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-... (in Portuguese with English abstract).
21.
Maciel C.D.G., Velini E.D., Martins D., Negrisoli E., Tofolli G.R. 2012. Corn seed treatment with naphthalic anhydride against isoxaflutole phytotoxication. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment 10 (1): 612–616.
22.
Menegat A., Kaise Y., Stephan A., Ni HanWen, Gerhardsm R. 2012. Chlorophyll fluorescence microscreening as a rapid detection method for herbicide resistance in grass weeds in North China plain winter wheat production systems and beyond. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research 18: 409–418.
23.
Pereira G.A.M., Barcellos Júnior L.H., Silva D.V., Braga R.R., Teixeira M.M., Silva A.A., Ribeiro Júnior J.I. 2015. Application height in herbicides efficiency in bean crops. Planta daninha 33 (3): 607–614. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
24.
Procópio S.O., Braz A.J.B.P., Barroso A.L.L., Cargnelutti Filho A., Cruvinel K.L., Betta M., Braz G.B.P., Fraga Filho J.J.S., Cunha Júnior L.D. 2009. Potential use of chlorimuronethyl, imazethapyr and cloransulam-methyl in common bean crop. Planta Daninha 27 (2): 327–336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-....
25.
Salgado T.P., Salles M.S., Martins J.V.F., Alves P.L.C.A. 2007. Interferência das plantas daninhas no feijoeiro carioca. [Weed interference in carioca beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)]. Planta Daninha 25 (3): 443–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-... (in Portuguese with English abstract).
26.
SBCPD. 1995. Procedimentos para instalação, avaliação e análise de experimentos com herbicidas. 42 p. Available on: https://www.scienceopen.com/do... (in Portuguese).
27.
Scholten R., Parreira M.C., Alves P.L.C.A. 2011. Período anterior à interferência das plantas daninhas para a cultivar de feijoeiro ‘Rubi’ em função do espaçamento e da densidade de semeadura. Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy 33 (2): 313–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/actasc... (in Portuguese).
28.
Wilson R.G. 2005. Response of dry bean and weeds to fomesafen and fomesafen tank mixtures. Weed technology 19 (1): 201–206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-04-....
29.
Yazbek Júnior W., Folonni L.L. 2004. Efeito de protetor de sementes na seletividade de herbicida na cultura do algodoeiro (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Revista Ecossistema 29: 33–38. (in Portuguese).
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
