REVIEW
Is the possibility of replacing seed dressings containing neonicotinoids with other means of protection viable in major Polish agricultural crops?
1
Department of Assessments and Opinions about Plant Protection Products, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute,
Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Submission date: 2015-07-15
Acceptance date: 2015-11-05
Corresponding author
Ewa Matyjaszczyk
Department of Assessments and Opinions about Plant Protection Products, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Department of Assessments and Opinions about Plant Protection Products, Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2015;55(4):330-335
KEYWORDS
alternativesclothianidineconomic consequencesimidaclopridinsecticideslimitationmaizeneonicotinoidsoilseedrapeprotectionseed dressingseed treatmentthiamethoxamwithdrawalPoland
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Following the limitations regarding the use of the neonicotinoids: clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid there are
no currently available insecticide seed dressings for oilseed rape in Poland. For maize here is only one seed dressing containing
methiocarb available with a very narrow registered scope of use. The impact of limitations on protection possibilities of other major
Polish agricultural crops is either negligible or non-existent. In consequence a group of economically important insect pests of maize
[dungbeetles (Melolonthidae)
;
click beetles (Elateridae)
;
noctuid moths (Agrotinae)] and oilseed rape [leaf miners (Agromyzidae),
tur-
nip sawfly (
Athalia colibri
Christ.), cabbage weevils (Curculionidae), cabbage root fly (
Hylemyia brassicae
Bche.), diamond-back moth
(
Plutella maculipennis
Curt.)] is left without any legal possibility of chemical control. For the other important pests of the early growth
stage of oilseed rape development, there are only pyrethroids available together with one product containing chloropiryfos that can
be applied once per vegetation season. Since both maize and oilseed rape are grown in Poland on the area of approximately 1 million
ha (each crop), this situation raises concerns about production possibilities as well as development of pest resistance
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Arthropod Pesticide Resistance Database 2015. Michigen State University, USA. Available on: http://www.pesticideresistance...: June 03, 2015].
2.
Bereś P.K. 2013. Studium naddoskonaleniem integrowanej ochrony kukurydzy przed zachodnią kukurydzianą stonka korzeniową (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera Le Conte) i omacnicą prosowianką (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.). [Study on the Improvement of Integrated Maize Protection Against the Western Corn Rootworm (Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) and the European Corn Borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hbn.)]. Rozprawy Naukowe Instytutu Ochrony Roślin – PIB, Poznań, Poland, 183 pp. (in Polish).
3.
Bereś P.K., Pruszyński G. 2008. Ochrona kukurydzy przed szkodnikami w integrowanej produkcji. [Integrated protection of maize against insect pests]. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Agricultura 7 (4): 19–32.
4.
Broniarz J., Paczocha J., MrówczyńskiM. 2015. Ochrona odmian rzepaku ozimego przed szkodnikami w badaniach porejestrowych COBORU. [Protection of the winter oilseed rape varieties against pests in post-registration testing system]. p. 104. In: Book of Abstracts. The 55. Scientific Session of Plant Protection Institute – National Research Institute. Poznań, Poland, 12–13 February 2015, 233 pp. (in Polish).
5.
Central Statistical Office 2003. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Warsaw, Poland, 790 pp. (in Polish).
6.
Central Statistical Office 2007. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture and Rural Areas. Warsaw, Poland, 255 pp. (in Polish)Central Statistical Office 2010. Statistical Yearbook of Agriculture and Rural Areas. Warsaw, Poland, 148 pp. (in Polish).
7.
Central Statistical Office 2014a. Charakterystyka gospodarstw rolnych w 2013 roku. [Characteristics of Agricultural Holdings in the Year 2013]. Warsaw, Poland, 450 pp. (in Polish).
8.
Central Statistical Office 2014b. Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Poland. Warsaw, Poland, 915 pp. (in Polish)Commission.
9.
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 485/2013 of 24 May 2013 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011, as regards the conditions of approval of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid, and prohibiting the use and sale of seeds treated with plant protection products containing those active substances.
10.
Heimbach U. 2015. Ein Jahr ohne insektizide Beizung im Raps. Innovation: das Magazin für die Landwirtschaft 2: 4–6. (in German).
11.
Heimbach U., Brandes M. 2015. Ohne Neonicotinoide klarkommen. Land und Forst 13: 24–26. (in German)Heimbach.
12.
U., Müller A. 2012. Incidence of pyrethroid-resistant oilseed rape pests in Germany. Pest Management Science 69 (2): 209–216.
13.
Kwaśniewski D. 2008. Efektywność ekonomiczna produkcji kukurydzy, rzepaku i wierzby energetycznej. [Economic efficiency of corn, oilseed rape and energetic villow production]. Problemy Inżynierii Rolniczej 1: 71–77. (in Polish)Matyjaszczyk E. 2013. Plant protection in Poland on the eve of obligatory Integrated Pest Management implementation. Pest Management Science 69 (9): 991–995.
14.
Matyjaszczyk E. 2015. Prevention methods for pest control and their use in Poland. Pest Management Science 71 (4): 485–491.
15.
Mrówczyński M. (ed.). 2013. Integrowana ochrona upraw rolniczych. Zastosowanie integrowanej ochrony. [Integrated protection of agricultural crops. Adoption of integrated protection]. Vol. 2. Powszechne Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne, Plant Protection Institute – National Research Institute, Poznań, Poland, 286 pp. (in Polish).
16.
Philippou D., Field L.M., Węgorek P., Zamojska J., Andrews M.C., Slater R., Moores G.D. 2011. Characterising metabolic resistance in pyrethroid-insensitive pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus F.) from Poland and Switzerland. Pest Management Science 67 (2): 239–243.
17.
Skarżyńska A. (ed.). 2007. Wyniki ekonomiczne wybranych produktów rolniczych w latach 2005–2006. [Economic results of selected agricultural products in 2005–2006].Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics – National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland, 137 pp. (in Polish).
18.
Skarżyńska A. (ed.). 2009. Wyniki ekonomiczne wybranych produktów rolniczych w 2008 roku. [Economic results of selected agricultural products in 2008]. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics – National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland, 122 pp. (in Polish).
19.
Skarżyńska A. (ed.). 2013. Projection of Income for 2015 for Selected Agricultural Products. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Multiannual Program Reports 2011–2014, No. 88.1. Available on: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bi... [Accessed: June 9, 2015].
20.
Skarżyńska A. (ed.). 2014. Projection of Income for the Selected Agricultural Products for 2020. Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics, Multiannual Program Reports 2011–2014, No. 105.1. Available on: https://depot.ceon.pl/bitstrea... [Accessed: June 9, 2015].
21.
Sosnowska D., Fiedler Ż. 2010. Biologiczna ochrona upraw pod osłonami jako przykład udanego wykorzystania metody biologicznej. [Biological control methods as a succesfull example of pest and disease management in greenhouse crops]. Progress in Plant Protection/Postępy w Ochronie Roślin 50 (3): 1080–1088. (in Polish with English summary).
22.
Stevens M.M. 2002. Seed treatments. p. 754–756. In: “Encyclopedia of Pest Management” (D. Pimientel, ed.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, Basel, USA, 931 pp.
23.
Taylor A.G., Harman G.E. 2003. Concepts and technologies of selected seed treatments. Annual Review of Phytopathology 28: 321–339.
24.
The register of authorized plant protection products 2015. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Poland. Available on: https://bip.minrol.gov.pl/Info... Ochrony-Roslin [Accessed: May 04, 2015].
25.
Węgorek P., Zamojska J., Mrówczyński M. 2011. High resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in Polish pollen beetle (Meligethes aeneus F.) – the role of oxidative metabolism. Phytoparasitica 39 (1): 43–49.
26.
Wrzesińska B., Czerwoniec A., Wieczorek P., Węgorek P., Zamojska J., Obrępalska-Stęplowska A. 2014. A survey of pyrethroid-resistant populations of Meligethes aeneus F. in Poland indicates the incidence of numerous substitutions in the pyrethroid target site of voltage-sensitive sodium channels in individual beatles. Insect Molecular Biology 23 (5): 682–693.
27.
Zimmer T., Nauen R. 2011. Pyrethroid resistance and thiacloprid baseline susceptibility of European populations of Meligethes aeneus(Coleoptera: Nitidulidae) collected in winter oilseed rape. PestManagement Science 67 (5): 699–608.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
