ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Influence of temperature and daylight length on barley infection by Pyrenophora teres
1
The August Cieszkowski Agricultural University, Department of Phytopathology
Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
Corresponding author
Tomasz Kosiada
The August Cieszkowski Agricultural University, Department of Phytopathology Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
The August Cieszkowski Agricultural University, Department of Phytopathology Dąbrowskiego 159, 60-594 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2008;48(1):9-15
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres is the most important disease of barley in many regions in which this cereal is cultivated. In the performed work the influence of solarization period and temperature on infection of barley by P. teres was estimated. Three isolates of each P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata were used. The response of six barley genotypes to the pathogen was estimated. Barley infection was differentiated and depended on solarization period, and the isolate of P. teres. Number of infected plants increased with the increase of temperature. Interaction occurred among length of solarization period and temperature. The highest barley infection by P. teres f. teres was observed at 10 hours of solarization and temperature 25°C.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (11)
1.
Arabi M.I., Barrault G., Sarrafi A., Albertini L. 1992. Variation in the resistance of barley cultivars and in the pathogenicity of Drechslera teres f. sp. maculata and D. teres f. sp. teres isolates from France. Plant Pathol. 41:180–186.
2.
Douiyssi A. 1998. Responses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Dis. 82 (3): 316–321.
3.
Graner A., Foroughi-Wehr B., Tekauz A. 1996. RFLP mapping of gene in barley conferring resistance to net blotch (Pyrenophora teres). Euphytica 91: 229–234.
4.
Janosova M. 1991. Study of growth dynamics of Pyrenophora teres (Drechs.) fungus imperfect. Vyskumny Ustav Rastlinnej Vyroby, Piestany (CSFR) 24: 78–87.
5.
Khan T.N. 1982. Occurrence and pathogenicity of Drechslera teres isolates causing spot-type symptoms on barley in Western Australia. Plant Dis. 66: 423–425.
6.
Mathre D.E. 1982. Compendium of barley diseases. The American Phytopathological Society: 22–24.
7.
Scott D.B. 1991. Identity of Pyrenophora isolates causing net-type and spot-type lesions on barley. Mycopathologia 116: 29–35.
8.
Shipton W.A., Khan T.N., Boyd W.J.R. 1973. Net blotch of barley. Rev. Plant Pathol. 52 (5): 269–290.
9.
Skurdeniene I. 2000. The study of Pyrenophora teres population in Lithuania. Phytopathol. Pol. 20: 107–113.
10.
Tekauz A., Mills J.T. 1974. New types of virulence in Pyrenophora teres in Canada. Can. J. Plant Sci. 54: 731–734.
11.
Tekauz A. 1990. Characterization and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata from western Canada. Can J. Plant Pathol. 12: 141–148.
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
