ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Controlling sugar beet mortality disease by application of new bioformulations
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Plant Pathology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, P. O. Box: 14515/775, Tehran 0098 , Iran
 
2
Plant Diseases Research Department, Iranian Research Institute of Plant Protection, P. O. Box 1452, Tehran 19395, Iran
 
3
Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Islamic Azad University Science and Research Branch, P. O. Box: 14515/775, Tehran 0098 , Iran
 
 
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2012;52(3):303-307
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
There is growing interests in the use of biological approaches to replace or reduce the application of chemical pesticides in modern agriculture. In this regard, antagonistic fungi and particularly bacteria have proved to be potential candidates. In the search for efficient alternative biofungicides, eight new Bioformulations were developed and prepared using two strains of Pseudomonas fluorescens (B1) and Bacillus coagulans (B2) isolated from different rhizospheric soils and plant roots of Iranian sugar beet fields. Bioformulations were developed using procedures described in the literature. Bioformulations included a talc-based powder and bentonite- based powder as inorganic carriers, and peat and rice bran as organic carriers. The results of our greenhouse experiment, where these bioformulations were applied to sugar beet seeds to control seedling mortality disease, showed that most of the treatments at different intervals (15, 30, 45 and 60 days after sowing) were effective in reducing the disease (compared to the untreated control). According to the results, six out of eight of the developed bioformulations, including Peat-B1, Peat-B2, R.B.-B2, Bent.-B1, Talc-B1 and Talc-B2, were more effective than commonly used fungicides (Carboxin-thiram) in controlling sugar beet mortality disease. Yet, two bioformulations (R.B.-B1 and Bent.-B2) were less effective than carboxin-thiram in the reduction of the disease incidence.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Amer G.A., Utkhede R.S. 2000. Development of formulation of biological agents for the management of root rot lettuce and cucumber. Can. J. Microbiol. 46 (6): 809–816.
 
2.
Ardekani S., Heydari A.,Khorasani N., Arjmandi M., Ehteshami R. 2009. Preparation of new biofungicides using antagonistic bacteria and mineral compounds for controlling cotton seedling damping-off disease. J. Plant Prot. Res. 49 (1): 49–55.
 
3.
Beatty P.H., Jensen S.E. 2002. Paenibacillus polymyxa produced fusaricidin-type antifungal antibiotics active against Leptosphaeria maculans, the causative agents of blackleg disease of canola. Can. J. Microbiol. 48 (2): 159–169.
 
4.
Bharathi R., Vivekananthan R., Harish S., Ramanathan A., Samiyappan R. 2004. Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chilies. Crop Prot. 23 (6): 835–843.
 
5.
Chung W.C., Huang J.W., Huang H.C. 2005. Formulation of a soil biofungicide for control of damping-off of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis) caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Biol. Control 32 (3): 287–294.
 
6.
Collins D.P., Jacobsen B. 2003. Optimizing a Bacillus subtilis isolate for biological control of sugar beet Cercospora leaf spot. Biol. Control J. 26 (2): 153–161.
 
7.
Dean R.A., Kuc J. 1985. Induced systemic protection in plants. Trends Biotechnol. 3 (2): 125–129.
 
8.
Duffy B.K., Simon A., Weller D.M. 1996. Combination of Trichoderma koningii with fluorescent pseudomonas for control take-all on wheat. Phytopathology 86 (2): 188–194.
 
9.
Heydari A., Misaghi I.J. 2003.The role of rhizosphere bacteria in herbicide-mediated increase in Rhizoctonia solani induced cotton seedling damping-off. Plant Soil 257 (3): 391–396.
 
10.
Howell C.R., James E., Richard H., William E. 1997. Field control of cotton seedling diseases with Trichoderma virens in combination with fungicide seed treatments. J. Cotton Sci. 1 (1): 15–20.
 
11.
Howie W., Suslow T. 1986. Effect of antifungal compound biosynthesis on cotton root colonization and Pythium suppression by a strain of Pseudomonas fluorescens and its antifungal minus isogenic mutant. J. Phytopathol.70 (8): 1069–1073.
 
12.
Jayaraj J., Radhakrishnan N.V., Kannan R., Sakthivel K., Suganya D., Venkatesan S., Velazhahan R. 2005. Development of new formulations of Bacillus subtilis for management of tomato damping-off caused by Pythium aphanidermatum. Biocontrol Sci. Technol.15 (1): 55–65.
 
13.
Kannan R., Jayaraj J. 1998. Effect of various levels of inoculation of Bacillus subtilis on the incidence of damping-off of tomato and on plant growth parameters. Annamalai Univ. Agric. Res. Ann. 16 (1): 25–30.
 
14.
Khodakaramian A., Heydari A., Balestra G.M. 2008. Evaluation of Pseudomonads bacterial isolates in biological control of citrus bacterial canker disease. Int. J. Agric. Res. 3 (4): 268–272.
 
15.
Lee W.H., Kobayashi D.Y. 1989. Isolation and identification of antifungal Pseudomonas sp. from sugar beet roots and its antibiotic products. Korean J. Plant Pathol. 4 (4): 264–267.
 
16.
Saravanakumar D.,Vijayakumar C., Kumar N., Samiyappan R. 2007. PGPR-induced defense responses in the tea plant against blister blight disease. Crop Prot. 26 (5): 556–565.
 
17.
Selim S., Negrel J., Govaerts C., Gianinazzi S., van Tuinen D. 2005. Isolation and partial characterization of antagonistic peptides produced by Paenibacillus sp. strain B2 isolated from the sorghum mycorrhizosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71 (8): 6501–6507.
 
18.
Shahraki M., HeydariA., Hassanzadeh N., Rezaei S., Naraghi L. 2008. Investigation on the possibility of biological control of sugar beet seedling damping-off disease. Iranian J. Agric. Sci. 13 (1): 23–38.
 
19.
Shahraki M., Heydari A., Hassanzadeh N. 2009. Investigation of antibiotic, siderophore and volatile metabolite production by bacterial antagonists against Rhizoctonia solani. Iranian J. Biol. 22 (1): 71–84.
 
20.
Shah-Smith D.A., Burns R.G. 1997. Shelf-life of a biocontrol Pseudomonas putida applied to the sugar beet seeds using commercial coatings. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 7 (1): 65–74.
 
21.
Sivan A., Chet I. 1986. Biological control of Fusarium sp.in cotton, wheat and muskmelon by Trichoderma harzianum. J. Phytopathol. 116 (1): 39–47.
 
22.
Sridhar R., Ramakrishnan G., Dinakaran D., Jeyarajan R. 1993. Studies on the efficacy of different carriers for antagonistic Bacillus subtilis. J. Biol. Control 7 (2): 112–114.
 
23.
Vidhyasekaran P., Muthuamilan M. 1995. Development of formulation of Pseudomonas flourescens for control of chickpea wilt. Plant Dis. 79 (6): 780–782.
 
24.
Vidhyasekaran P., Rabindran R., Muthamilan M., Nayar K., Rajappan K., Subramanian N., Vasumathi K. 1997. Development of a powder formulation of Pseudomonas flourescens for control of rice blast. Plant Pathol. 46 (4): 291–297.
 
25.
Viswanathan R., Samiyappan R. 2001. Antifungal activity of chitinase produced by some fluorescent pseudomonads against Colletotrichum falcatum causing red rot disease in sugarcane. Microbiol. Res. 155 (5): 309–314.
 
26.
Weller D.M. 1998. Biological control of soil-born plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. J. Ann. Rev. Phytophatol. 26 (1): 379–407.
 
eISSN:1899-007X
ISSN:1427-4345
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top