ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Components of quantitative resistance in barley plants to Fusarium head blight infection determined using three in vitro assays
1
Department of Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, 17th Nissan St. – Kafersouseh, 6091 Damascus, Syria
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article
Submission date: 2017-10-26
Acceptance date: 2018-02-27
Corresponding author
Nachaat Sakr
Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, 17th Nissan St. – Kafersouseh, 6091 Damascus, Syria
Agriculture, Atomic Energy Commission of Syria, 17th Nissan St. – Kafersouseh, 6091 Damascus, Syria
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2018;58(2):176-183
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Quantitative resistance in barley to four Fusarium head blight (FHB) species was investigated in vitro. Nine components involved in three assays (detached leaf, modified Petri-dish and seedling tests) were compared on two widely grown Syrian barley cultivars: Arabi Aswad (AS) and Arabi Abiad (AB). On AB, inoculation with FHB species resulted in significantly shorter latent period, larger lesion length of detached leaf inoculation, more AUDPC standard and higher percentage of infected seedlings of pin-point inoculation compared with AS. Latent period of AB was 14.89% less than AS, lesion length of AB was 6.01% less than AS, AUDPC standard of AS was less 17.07% than AB and percentage of infected seedlings of AS was 4.87% less than AB. Inoculation with FHB species resulted in no significant differences in other five components measured: incubation period, lesion length of clip-dipping inoculation, germination rate reduction, coleoptile length reduction, and percentage of infected seedlings of foliar-spraying inoculation. AS was more resistant to in vitro FHB infection than AB. Latent period and AUDPC standard recorded the highest values compared with the lowest values for lesion length and percentage of infected seedlings. It seems that measurement of latent period and AUDPC standard may be useful in identifying barley cultivars highly susceptible or resistant to FHB at early stages.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Abang M.M., Baum M., Ceccarelli S., Grando, S., Linde C.C., Yahyaoui A., Zhan J., McDonald B.A. 2006. Differential selection on Rhynchosporium secalis during parasitic and saprophytic phases in the barley scald disease cycle. Phytopathology 96 (11): 1214–1222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/phyto-....
2.
Alazem M. 2007. Evaluating genetic variation of Fusarium head blight by molecular markers. Dissertation, University of Damascus, Damascus, Syria, 72 pp.
3.
Bedawy I.M.A., Dehne H.W., Leon J., Naz A.A. 2018. Mining the global diversity of barley for Fusarium resistance using leaf and spike inoculations. Euphytica 214: 18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681....
4.
Browne R.A. 2007. Components of resistance to fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat detected in a seed-germination assay with Microdochium majus and the relationship to FHB disease development and mycotoxin accumulation from Fusarium graminearum infection. Plant Pathology 56 (1): 65–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
5.
Browne R.A. 2009. Investigation into components of partial disease resistance, determined in vitro, and the concept of types of resistance to Fusarium head blight (FHB) in wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology 123 (2): 229–234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658....
6.
Browne R.A., Cooke B.M. 2004. Development and evaluation of an in vitro detached leaf assay for pre-screening resistance to Fusarium head blight in wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology 110 (1): 91–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EJPP....
7.
Browne R.A., Cooke B.M. 2005. A comparative assessment of potential components of partial disease resistance to Fusarium head blight using a detached leaf assay of wheat, barley and oats. European Journal of Plant Pathology 112 (3): 247–258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658....
8.
Canci P.C., Nduulu L.M., Muehlbauer G.J,. Dill-Macky R., Rasmusson D.C., Smith K.P. 2004. Validation of quantitative trait loci for Fusarium head blight and kernel discoloration in barley. Molecular Breeding 14 (2): 91–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MOLB....
9.
Capettini F., Rasmusson D.C., Dill-Macky R., Schiefelbein E., Elakkad A. 2003. Inheritance of resistance to Fusarium head blight in four populations of barley. Crop Science 43 (6): 1960–1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsc....
10.
Chehri K., Godini R. 2017. Detection of nivalenol and deoxynivalenol chemotypes produced by Fusarium graminearum species complex isolated from barley in Iran using specific PCR assays. Journal of Plant Protection Research 57 (3): 237–242. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2....
11.
Chrpova J., Sip V., Stockova L., Stemberkova L., Tvaruzek L. 2011. Resistance to Fusarium head blight in spring barley. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 47 (2): 58–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/129/2....
12.
Geddes J., Eudes F., Tucker J.R., Legge W.G., Selinger L.B. 2008. Evaluation of inoculation methods on infection and deoxynivalenol production by Fusarium graminearum on barley. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 30 (1): 66–73. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0706....
13.
He X., Osman M., Helm J., Capettini F., Pawan K., Singh P.K. 2015. Evaluation of Canadian barley breeding lines for Fusarium head blight resistance. Canadian Journal Plant Science 95 (5): 923–929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4141/cjps-2....
14.
Khaledi N., Taheri P., Falahati-Rastegar M. 2018. Evaluation of resistance and the role of some defense responses in wheat cultivars to Fusarium head blight. Journal of Plant Protection Research 57 (4): 396–408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2....
15.
Kumar K., Xi K., Turkington T.K., Tekauz A., Helm J.H., Tewari J.P. 2011. Evaluation of a detached leaf assay to measure fusarium head blight resistance components in barley. Candian Journal of Plant Pathology 33 (3): 364–374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/070606....
16.
Lenc L. 2015. Fusarium head blight (FHB) and Fusarium populations in grain of winter wheat grown in different cultivation systems. Journal of Plant Protection Research 55 (1): 94–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2....
17.
Lenc L., Czecholinski G., Wyczling D., Turow T., Kazmierczak A. Fusarium head blight (FHB) and Fusarium spp. on grain of spring wheat cultivars grown in Poland. Journal of Plant Protection Research 55 (3): 94–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2....
18.
Mesterhazy A. 2002. Role of deoxynivalenol in aggressiveness of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum and in resistance to Fusarium head blight. European Journal of Plant Pathology 108 (7): 675–684. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020....
19.
Nelson P.E., Toussoun T.A., Marasas W.F.O. (ed.). 1983. Fusarium Species: An Illustrated Manual for Identification. The Pennsylvania State Univ. Press, Pennsylvania, USA, 193 pp.
20.
Opoku N., Back M., Edwards S. 2011. Aggressiveness of Fusarium langsethiae isolates towards wheat, barley and oats in an in vitro leaf assay. Plant Breeding and Seed Science 64 (1): 55–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10129....
21.
Parry D.W., Jekinson P., MCleod L. 1995. Fusarium ear blight (scab) in small grain cereals-a review. Plant Pathology 44 (2): 207–238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365....
22.
Purahong W., Alkadri D., Nipoti P., Pisi A., Lemmens M., Prodi A. 2012. Validation of a modified Petri-dish test to quantify aggressiveness of Fusarium graminearum in durum wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology 132 (3): 381–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658....
23.
Sakr N. 2017a. Aggressiveness of four Fusarium head blight species on wheat cultivars. Advances in Horticultural Science 31 (3): 199–203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13128/ahs-2....
24.
Sakr N. 2017b. In vitro assessment of Fusarium head blight spp. on wheat cultivars. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 50 (5–6): 254–261. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0323....
25.
Sakr N. 2018a. Aggressiveness variation among and within Fusarium head blight species on barley in vitro. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 53 (1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/038.52....
26.
Sakr N. 2018b. Evaluation of two storage methods for fungal isolates of Fusarium sp. and Cochliobolus sativus. Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica 53 (1): 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/038.53....
27.
Shin S., Kim K.H., Kang C.S., Cho K.M., Park C.S., Okagaki R., Park J.C. 2014. Simple method for the assessment of Fusarium head blight resistance in Korean wheat seedlings inoculated with Fusarium graminearum. Plant Pathology Journal 30 (1): 25–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.OA....
28.
Soresi D., Zappacosta D., Garayalde A., Miranda R., Carrera A. 2015. An in vitro assay for pre-screening resistance to Fusarium head blight in durum wheat. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 54 (2): 253−264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14601/Phyto....
29.
van Leur J.A.G., Alamdar M.Z., Khawatmi S. 1997. Effect of common root rot (Cochliobolus sativus) on yields of barley under experimental conditions in northern Syria. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 48 (3): 351–357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/A93126.
30.
Xue A.G., Ho K.M., Butler G., Vigier B.J., Babcock C. 2006. Pathogenicity of Fusarium species causing head blight in barley. Phytoprotection 87 (2): 55–61. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/0139....
| eISSN: | 1899-007X |
| ISSN: | 1427-4345 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
