ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Active substances used in plant protection in Poland after the European Union accession
More details
Hide details
1
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute
Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Corresponding author
Ewa Matyjaszczyk
Institute of Plant Protection – National Research Institute
Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznań, Poland
Journal of Plant Protection Research 2011;51(3):217-224
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
In the years 2003–2009, a significant reduction of active substances of plant protection products was observed in Poland. The
amount of active substances decreased from 340 in 2003 to 279 in 2009. The real difference proved to be much higher because some
substances were being withdrawn, and at the same time, new ones were being introduced on the market. The reductions were observed in all groups of plant protection products. The biggest decrease took place in the case of insecticides, which also had a smaller
than average number of registered formulations compared to herbicides and fungicides. Herbicides had the highest number of regis
tered formulations per active substance, while fungicides were the only group where the average number of registered formulations
per active substance had increased in the analyzed period.
The main reason for the described changes was the European Union’s review of active substances. Substances which could pose a risk
for humans or the environment were withdrawn. This positively influenced overall safety. The changes, however, also gave rise to
some problems which are noted. Particularly pressing in Poland, is the problem of minor crops protection.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interests exist.
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Carlson R. 1962. Silent Spring. First Mariner Books Edition 2002, 378 pp.
2.
Chlebicka A., Fałkowski J., Wołek T. 2008. Powstawanie grup producentów rolnych a zmienność cen. Fundacja Programów Pomocy dla Rolnictwa, Warszawa www.fapa.com.pl/gfx/saepr/Grupy%20producentow%20rolnych%20a%20zmiennosc%20cen-raport%2011_08.pdf], Access: 15.03.2010.
3.
Directive. 2006. Commission Directive 2006/135/EC of 11 December 2006 amending Council Directive 91/414/EEC to include carbendazim as active substance L 349/37.
4.
Directive. 1991. Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning placing plant protection products on the market. 1991. Offic. J. L 230: 1–32.
7.
Heimbach U., Kral G., Niemann P. 2002. EU regulatory aspects of resistance risk assessment. Pest Manage. Sci. 58: 935–938.
8.
Inspekcja Jakości Handlowej Artykułów Rolno-Spożywczych. 2009. Raport o Stanie Rolnictwa Ekologicznego w Polsce w Latach 2007–2008. Warszawa, 86 pp.
9.
Matyjaszczyk E. 2008. Changes on the market of plant protection products in Poland three years after accession to the European Union. Outlooks on Pest Menage.: 11–13.
10.
Matyjaszczyk E. 2009. Konsekwencje zmian na liście środków ochrony roślin dopuszczonych do obrotu i stosowania w Polsce dla wybranych roślin uprawnych. Prog. Plant Protection/Post. Ochr. Roślin 49 (2): 492–499.
11.
Plant Protect. Act of 18th December 2003 (Dz.U. z 2004r. nr 11, poz. 94).
12.
Register of plant protection products placed on the Polish market. 2010. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development
http://www.bip.minrol.gov.pl/D..., Access: 04.01.2010.
14.
Sales and reserve of plant protection products. Data of producers and importers Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
http://www.bip.minrol.gov.pl/D.... Access: 13.09.2010.
15.
Tomlin C.D.S. (editor). 2009. A Word Compendium The Pesticide Manual. 15th ed., British Crop Protection Council, 1457 pp.
16.
Węgorek P. 2007. Historia Odporności Owadów na Insektycydy. Instytut Ochrony Roślin, Poznań, 68 pp.
17.
World Health Organization. 1990. Public Health Impact of Pesticides Used in Agriculture. Geneva, 128 pp.